Previous Page  63 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 63 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

z

Blinded or improperly working air pads:

properly maintain air pads and piping.

Pneumatics

One problem is the fact that pressurised air is being

blown into a space that is restricted. Pressures used

regularly exceed 20 pounds per square inch. This

equates to a pressure of nearly 3000 pounds per

square foot (psf). The weight of most reinforced

concrete silo roofs is less than 100 psf. While the

pneumatic issue is one that is both a pressure and

a volume one, it is simple to see that unregulated

pressures in transporting material could cause issues.

Most silos/silo groups have a dust collector on the

roof. Often, this is sufficient for helping to regulate

of assist in releasing pressures, but many dust

collector manufacturers state that their equipment

should not be relied upon for pressure relief. The

installation of a pressure relief system, including

pressure relief valves, typically requires only a small

investment.

Another issue with the use of pneumatics is

the improper use of air to assist with reclaiming

material. It is standard practice to use pressurised

air through air pads to fluidise the bottom few feet

in a silo, especially of a powdered material, such

as kiln feed or finished cement, when discharging

that material from the storage space. However,

issues develop over time. Either air pads clog, an

insufficient amount of air is provided, or other

reasons prevent proper flow. Typically, facility

personnel solve the problem operationally by using

plant air, and often do not close the valve that

supplies it when reclaim operations are not running.

Two initial problems arise. One is the clogging of

air pads. If all air pads are not operating in a similar

manner, then the flow channel that develops can tilt,

leading to asymmetric flow issues (see above). Another

is when personnel use plant air and leave it supplied

to the material in the storage space. This can lead

The use of this interstice has led to an overstress in the

wall, leading to the loss of a significant portion of the

wall section, leaving reinforcement exposed and the

structure compromised.