Previous Page  109 / 140 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 109 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

ZZZ GLVDE FRP Ɣ &RQWDFW8V#GLVDE FRP

DISAB

prevents dust build-ups from happening

by cleaning and removing dirt, dust and

spillages using vacuum based technology with

a powerful suction ability. Our mobile, semi-

mobile, and stationary machines and system

solutions help facilitate good housekeeping to

increase the safety of your workers.

Contact us for more information on how you can

keep your cement plant and workers safe!

Good Housekeeping:

Prevent dust build-ups with DISAB

9LVLW XV DW

AICCE23

BOOTH

# 68

Mobile Vacuum System

Filter Separator

Vacuum Unit (5-160 kW)

Pre-Separator

Stationary Vacuum System

Semi-Mobile Vacuum System

linked to a certain type of technology or product. Thus,

a proper technical assessment is fundamental, otherwise

benchmarking runs the risk of becoming a purely statistical

exercise, of which the added value for energy efficiency

optimisation purposes might be questionable.

Conclusion

By increasing the use of AFs and improving energy

efficiency, the cement industry has proven in the past

decades that sustainability and the simultaneous reduction

of operational costs can go hand in hand. Energy reviews

are one of the most time- and cost-effective ways to

uncover potential energy savings in cement plants and

thus reduce CO

2

emissions even further. Potential energy

savings are plant specific and some trade-offs must

be negotiated. Therefore, recommendations must be

technically supported and customer oriented. Numerous

energy reviews have shown that practically all plants

reviewed showed potentials for improvement with regard

to energy demand and, consequently, reducing energy

costs. In order to reach the highest technical level, the

correct operation and maintenance of state-of-the-art

equipment, tight control of the whole process, and careful

selection of fuels and raw materials is fundamental. A

detailed review can always help to uncover improvement

potentials, which was also the case in plants that were

well-operated and maintained, and where major energy

efficiency measures had already been identified and

implemented.

References

1. IEA, ‘Cement Technology Roadmap 2009,’

https://www.iea.

org/publications/freepublications/publication/Cement.pdf

(accessed on 29/8/18).

2. HOENIG, V., KORING, K., FLEIGER, P., MÜLLER, C., PALM, S.,

REINERS, J., ‘Energy efficiency in cement production: part 1,’

Cement International

, Vol. 11 (March 2013), pp. 50 – 67.

3. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, ‘Best

Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the

Production of Cement, Lime, and Magnesium Oxide’ (2013).

4. ECRA, WBCSD, ‘Development of State of the Art Techniques

in Cement Manufacturing: Trying to Look Ahead’

CSI-ECRA

Technology Papers

,

http://www.wbcsdcement.org/pdf/

technology/CSI_ECRA_Technology_Papers_2017.pdf, (2017).

About the authors

Marco Lindemann Lino is a Project Engineer and Researcher at

VDZ gGmbH. He has over 12 years of experience in cement

processing technology and in the past few years he has carried

out numerous energy reviews in cement plants worldwide. He

holds a diploma in mechanical engineering from IST - Technical

University of Lisbon, Portugal.

Volker Hoenig is the Managing Director of VDZ gGmbH. He has

more than 25 years of experience in cement and lime processing

technology. He is an expert in thermal processing, energy

efficiency, fuel substitution, and pyroprocess optimisation, as well

as environmental technologies. He holds a PhD in energy process

technology and environmental protection from the University of

Stuttgart, Germany.