Previous Page  98 / 140 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 98 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

November 2018

96 \

World Cement

to look at this technology and one pilot plant is

operating in Taiwan.

Biological processes are of great interest to

cement manufacturers and practically all of the large

international cement producers have performed

some type of experimentation with either algae or

microbes. Pilot projects have been started on almost

all continents, with several pilots being directly tied

to operating cement plants and others utilising

simulated flue gases. Interest in these technologies has

dissipated of late, as most indicated negative energy

balances. That is, the energy required to convert the

CO

2

into a useful product was more than the energy

used to create the CO

2

in the first place. Higher-end

products, such as cosmetics and pharmaceuticals, still

hold interest and the Taiwan pilot plant is proceeding

in this direction. These projects often require a large

physical footprint.

Membranes may be the simplest technology to

apply. A membrane is used to separate an exhaust

gas stream from a CO

2

rich stream. The membrane

is designed to allow only CO

2

molecules through,

while keeping all other gases and solids out. The CO

2

movement is driven by a combination of pressure

and vacuum. Although this technology holds

promise, it still faces several challenges, such as the

large amounts of surface area necessary and the

deterioration of the membrane material due to gas

contaminants. At least one membrane technology has

been tested in a cement plant in Norway.

Cryogenic separation of CO

2

relies on the unique

property of CO

2

of having a triple point, whereby a

small move in either temperature or pressure allows

the CO

2

to pass between the gaseous, liquid, and

solid phases. Gases are cooled to a point where CO

2

is extracted, either as a liquid or a solid. This process

does not require any other reagents, but does require

a large amount of energy to drive. Cryogenic capture

of CO

2

has been piloted for short durations at two

cement plants in the US.

Amines and similar liquid sorbent technologies

are the most well-known and advanced globally.

These technologies could blur the lines between

solids processing plants producing cement and

chemical plants operating sophisticated chemical

processes. Solid sorbents, especially carbonate

looping technologies, seem more similar to the solids

handling typical in cement plants. Cryogenic processes

are fairly simple, but require a large amount of

energy. Biological processes hold a high potential for

the future, as they can actually create a value-added

product. The trick is to find a product with sufficient

volume to use a large amount of CO

2

. Any of these

technologies can be added to an existing operation,

as long as space allows.

Conclusion

The landscape for CO

2

regulations is still evolving,

with some jurisdictions taking a strong lead, while

most of the others wait to see what happens. This

leads to uncertainty in investment decisions: do

cement producers continue to build cement plants

as they currently do? If not, what changes should be

made? Tail pipe solutions can always be added to

existing cement plants at a later date. However, these

technologies may end up being more costly than

designed-in applications, such as oxy-combustion,

oxy-calcination, and indirect calcination. Many

technologies have been trialled but there are no clear

leaders or global solutions.

Enabling oxy-calcination as potentially a small

incremental investment in new plant design and

construction appears to be a reasonable insurance

policy against an uncertain future.

References

1. CSI Roadmap:

https://www.wbcsdcement.org/index.

php/publications.

2. CRH Sustainability Report:

https://www.crh.com/

sustainability/sustainability-publications

3. Ultratech Sustainability Report: https://www.

ultratechcement.com/sustainability

4. Taiheyo Sustainability Report:

http://www.taiheiyo

-

cement.co.jp/english/csr/csr_fr.html

5. Cemex Sustainability Report:

https://www.cemex.com/

sustainability/reports/global-reports

6. LafargeHolcim Sustainability Report: https://www.

lafargeholcim.com/sustainable-development

7. Heidelberg Sustainability Report: https://www.

heidelbergcement.com/en/sustainability-report

8. IEA-CSI Technology Roadmap: Low-carbon Transition

in the Cement Industry:

http://www.wbcsdcement.org/

index.php/key-issues/climate-protection/technology-

roadmap

9. ECRA Oxy-Combustion Pilots:

https://www.cemnet

.

com/News/story/163335/ecra-to-test-oxyfuel-on-

industrial-scale-with-two-pilot-projects.html

10. LEILAC Indirect Calcination:

https://www.project

-leilac.

eu/latest-news

Further reading

KLINE, J., KLINE, C., ‘Cement and CO

2

: What is

Happening’, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,

Vol. 51, No. 2 (March – April 2015 ) DOI: 10.1109/

TIA.2014.2339396.

About the author

John Kline is the Principal at Kline Consulting LLC, a

consulting firm assisting sustainable building material

companies (start-ups to global producers) to improve their

operational and environmental performance. Kline has

over 40 Years in the mineral processing industry working in

research, sales, plant design, engineering, commissioning,

and operations. He retired from Lafarge in June 2012 after

21 years, with the last 18 years in various international,

executive positions. Kline Consulting currently specialises

in green building products, CO

2

reduction technologies,

and mercury abatement.