Previous Page  32 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

North America 2018

30 \

World Cement

local emission limits. This cement producer uses waste,

plastics, lignite, and anthracite as fuels and utilises

oxygen injection into the main burner flame to support

combustion of hard-to-burn fuels without negative

impact on clinker quality or emissions. Before installation

of any oxygen lance technology, the plant was required

to reduce NO

X

by 60% and CO by 20%. Initial testing

performed by the plant showed these reduction targets

were not achievable by decreasing the excess air

level alone. Uniquely, this plant does not experience

reductions in clinker quality due to increasingly reductive

atmospheres in the kiln, enabling deep combustion

staging. Capital intensive processes, such as SCR and

SNCR, were not considered economically feasible for

this plant. This presented an ideal opportunity to utilise

oxygen injection to reduce NO

X

and CO emissions. A

phased approach, starting with cold oxygen lancing and

then moving to OPTILANCE hot oxygen technology, was

taken to minimise complexity and overall installation

and operational costs. Installation of the Praxair system

is simple and causes minimal disruptions to the cement

making process.

To reduce NO

X

, secondary air at the main burner was

reduced through combustion optimisation, resulting in

increased and unacceptable levels of CO. To counteract

the increase in CO, a test campaign was undertaken

using cold oxygen lances installed in the riser duct.

Various injection locations, O

2

jet speed, and O

2

flow

rates were investigated to determine the optimum

system configuration. Figure 3 shows the response of

CO at the flue stack to changes of oxygen flow from a

lance operating in the optimum position and injection

velocity. Removing lance O

2

flow causes an immediate

increase in stack CO, while restoring lance O

2

flow reduces

the CO. Using cold oxygen, the plant was able to meet

the reduced CO emission limit, but only achieved a 50%

reduction in NO

X

, falling short of the requirement. Despite

the good success in reducing both NO

X

and CO, further

reductions were required.

The second phase of the installation was to use

OPTILANCE technology to increase the amount of flue

gas mixing with the O

2

jet and to increase the reactivity

of the jet. A hot oxygen lance and control system were

installed and commissioned at the plant in May 2017. As

anticipated, reductions beyond those accomplished by

cold O

2

lances were immediately realised. Figure 4 and

Figure 5 respectively compare daily averages of stack

CO and NO

X

for cold and hot O

2

as a function of the

lance O

2

flowrate. Cold O

2

emissions data are relatively

constant across the range of O

2

flows, which is due to

the integrated optimisation of the cold O

2

lances with

the kiln operation. Benefits of OPTILANCE technology

are easily discerned. As hot O

2

flow increases, CO and

NO

X

simultaneously reduce, trending below 75% of the

average cold O

2

emission rate.

Conclusion

The OPTILANCE technology can bring the plant NO

X

and CO

levels below the new emissions limits, with total reductions

greater than 60% for NO

X

and 30% for CO depending on

current emission levels and other factors. It is expected

that further reductions in CO and NO

X

are achievable with

increased control tuning, operating experience, and higher

injection rates.

About the author

Stefan Laux is the Director of the Application Equipment Group

at Praxair’s R&D location in Tonawanda, New York, US. He is

responsible for burners and application equipment for oxygen

combustion in metal, energy, refining, glass, and cement

industries. Before joining Praxair in 2004, he was a Power

Plant Combustion Engineer with Foster Wheeler in New Jersey,

US, and Steinmüller in Germany. Laux received a Bachelor

of Engineering from Dartmouth College and a Master and

Doctorate of Engineering from Aachen University of Technology

in Germany.

Figure 3. Stack emission response with respect to

oxygen injection.

Figure 4. CO reduction using OPTILANCE hot oxygen

technology relative to cold O

2

.

Figure 5. NO

X

reduction using OPTILANCE hot oxygen

technology relative to cold O

2

.